Feb 19 • 4M

Chapter 11, Part 3: "Justice" is Zugzwang

As soon as the FTC case against Martin Shkreli was unsealed, I knew he was “f-ked.” Here is why.


Appears in this episode

Christie Smythe
My experiences uncovering the story of, and falling in love with, Martin Shkreli.
Episode details

In case you’re unfamiliar, the title of this section references a chess term. It’s a German word for that specific kind of tight spot where no matter what move you make, you end up worse off. And that was exactly the situation Martin Shkreli found himself in, on a 3D chess board, after he was sued by the Federal Trade Commission and a pack of attorneys general in January 2020.

The agencies had been poking into Martin for a while, looking for antitrust violations ever since he drew so much attention to himself by raising the price of Daraprim as CEO of Turing Pharmaceuticals in 2015. But as far as anyone could tell, not much progress was made in the probes for years. Then came a blessed break for them – a story in the Wall Street Journal alleging that Martin had been “running” Turing (then named Vyera) while incarcerated with a contraband cell phone. 

Justice is blind. Allegedly.
Justice is blind. Allegedly.

The investigators seized on the material, dug around for some more, and found jailhouse emails and other communications from Martin suggesting that he had directed his former colleagues to obstruct generic competition. Even though the obstruction didn’t work for very long – a generic version of Daraprim won FDA approval in 2020 – and the generic wasn’t priced much lower than the tens of thousands of dollars per bottle Martin charged, the agencies had enough evidence to sue both Vyera and the much-hated “Pharma Bro.” 

As a legal reporter for Bloomberg, I had covered several big antitrust cases. They tended to be polite, dignified and slow-moving affairs. The matters were complex, and often required many highly-paid lawyers digesting millions of pages of documents. “Discovery,” the period when information is exchanged, and litigating back-and-forth over motions in court could easily go on for several years or more. 

There never seemed to be much of a rush. Federal judges showed appreciation for the caliber of legal professionals and the sophistication of the matters at issue. They bent over backwards to be fair, encouraged amicable settlements, and gave everyone ample opportunity to fully prepare and present their case to the best of their abilities.

But of course, that was not the experience for Martin Shkreli. 

This episode is for paid subscribers